This is the 21st century, and we should deserve to live in it. It was also a key campaign issue for , the Vermont Senator who ran against Hillary Clinton for the Democratic Presidential nomination in the. As a consequence, people who gain a degree, end up with a relatively higher salary. Stop jumping on band wagons and do some research. However, college and university students in Canada do tend to pay less for their education than students in the U.
Think of the good that could be done educating everyone. Maybe exceptions can be made for students from more poor backgrounds and they pay lesser fees but it should not be free because then there is no point. Some people find their calling and talents in more practical work environments from an early age. First of all, the government is currently spending billions of dollars on for-profit schools and other colleges and universities that have very low graduation rates. I don't think that it should be free because some degrees that people pursue require more or less work than others and yield different results.
In this sophisticated world a high standard of work is a must. But if the elite consider the fact that an educated world is a healthier, more peaceful and yes, more profitable world; their hands would have shot up too. When the cost of attending college, university, or trade school is too high, a lot of students simply choose not to pursue a higher education. We should all be allowed the access to education. America might become even more socially divided.
In addition to this, many people do not have the motivation and or desire to reach a upper class of education in college. In theory, students could take out loans or work part-time, but this may be sufficient to discourage students from studying and instead may enter the job market earlier. This approach would actually create more equality among students, and would also help to bridge the ever-increasing income gap. To begin with, when universities are offered for free, that will increase the equality of opportunities. If we spend billions on free university education there is an opportunity cost of higher taxes or less spending elsewhere. Often this debate centres on the question of accessibility.
All your feedback and complaints, sent to me personally, directly affect the company' rating. . Unemployment and underemployment are terrible wastes of human capital. If everyone doesn't have money to attend universities then who will be those smart lawyers, Helpful doctors, Powerful president if we don't educate well. But, if we finance university education through a graduate tax paid when graduates get a decent income then it may be less of a disincentive. Furthermore, charging to study at university will increase inequality of opportunity as students with low-income parents will be more likely to be deterred from going to university.
I find it hard to believe that they would be successful at the university level. Most people of today can hardly afford a car let alone the fees and tuition of college. Students need to depend on themselves; otherwise, every taxpayer will have to cover their education expenses and the government will give tax credit paper. Ontario has recently done studies to find that they could be a leading example in providing equal education for students. University should be free for everyone and that will make a big change to the world. I disagree with these ideas and I insist college education should not be free because in the end, someone will pay salaries of professors…. They point out that other options have been shown to work well and that those options might be a lot less expensive for American taxpayers.
And the completion rate at New York community colleges is only 20. Every program must be funded. Why Tuition Should be Free Four Reasons Why University Education Should Be Free Observations and analyses in this essay are those of the author, and are not to be attributed to the service provider or to any institution. There should be rules and regulations in place and should be maintained by… 863 Words 4 Pages Should college education and universities have free education for high graduates? At a certain point, once the percentage of people going to high school hit a certain level, it became a service that was just paid for through government coffers as opposed to being paid for through individual tuition. But the legislation would only cover tuition and fees, not books, room and board, or other expenses. One reason why is that countries with free college education tend to have lower levels of student debt among their graduates. How can a nation expect such high achievements with such an unbelievably selective method of individual success? It means navigating advanced courses, standardized tests, and forms.
As of 1998, public university is not free in England, Wales, Scotland, or Northern Ireland. This is because the cost of universities and colleges would have to be payed for by the working age people taking millions of dollars from their own profit and increasing taxes on all other things. And now we are going to make them free? Everyone should have equal access to education, and the only way to accomplish this in a society with large economic class diversity is to provide education for free. It also begs the question, College student persistence and success will decrease Free college has the potential to undermine persistence. Young people should not have to bear a debt of tens of thousands of dollars upon graduation. For this reason, blanket policies at the K-12 level have not been successful. But withdrawing from a class has financial ramifications.