In addition, the debate over affirmative action is about what role diversity in student body play in both the academic mission of a university and in the quality of life on campus. More specifically, equality in the conditions and the opportunities it provides has been sought as one of its major goals. Position: Affirmative Action for Women and Racial Minorities is not Good for American Supporting Facts Opponents of affirmative action argue that it is relatively unfair to rate college applicants basing on their race and gender instead of their merits. In this paper, I will present evidence to support that position. Many African Americans such as President Barack Obama, Senator Cory Booker, the writer Toni Morrison, the literary scholar Henry Louis Gates, media star Oprah Winfrey, and rap star Jay-Z have achieved positions of power and influence in the wider society Giddens, Duneier, Appelbaum Under the Affirmative Action policy, or preferential hiring, the firm must hire someone who is underrepresented. Also, it presupposes that all people of the same skin color are from the lower class, and therefore need help.
In the past few decades the number of minorities and females in places of higher education and companies have been rising at a slow rate. Affirmative action also takes place in many different places such as schools, jobs, and housing. In the essence, affirmative action was meant to restore the lingering vestiges of discrimination and create opportunities for the underrepresented groups Moore, 2009. Diversity And The Law In 1954, Brown v. Preferential treatment of minorities has caused problems not only in the workplace, but also in our universities throughout the country. When universities adopt affirmative action in the admissions they understand that merit plays a more important factor.
The Affirmative Action Policy was absolutely a necessity in the 1960s which was when the policy was first implemented. Usually coming from lower-income families, they would have lesser opportunities to attend private schools, unlike white students. Is Affirmative Action in College Admissions Effective? A solution to the first problem that aggravates the second is no solution at all. At places like California Institute of Technology, where race is not considered, the percentage of Asian-Americans is twice that found at Harvard. The Government: The Government on the whole, however, has maintained a position somewhere in the middle. Today affirmative action and other racial injustices tend to be in the spotlight quite often, such….
This is now under fire for being much like a quota system, as a certain number of minorities must be admitted to the school, according to policy. Along with this decrease of women in higher education also comes a decrease of women in the workforce. If we continue burying the issues with affirmative action, we will not only be lessening the meaning of education but creating isolation between… 2893 Words 12 Pages Anxiously awaiting its contents, the high school senior stares at his mailbox. Since the minorities in that area are low-income they cannot afford to attend a private high school that can better prepare them for college. The policy was a necessity to overcome the debate over affirmative action.
The recent news that the Trump administration may use the U. In sharp contrast, population of the minorities is dwindling in both California and Texas due to the mounting pressure from the states legislators to have affirmative action policies scrapped off in education sector. These schools have strict policies on the criteria for the acceptance of such students. Affirmative action is important because students with a disadvantaged background need the help, American society still gives priority to one racial group over another, and because we owe it to minorities to make up for discrimination against them in the past. In any case the report has generated a new spate of and op-eds about affirmative action and related issues.
This encourages acceptance and cross-cultural learning, often strengthening the business or school as a result. Instead of getting rid of affirmative action altogether, the court decided to let state voters control what will happen. Some people believe that instigating affirmative action in the college admissions process would create a much more diverse educational environment. Is that evidence of an enrollment quota or ceiling? These are criteria that put everyone on the same level because everyone has the ability to work harder or join more athletics. Affirmative Action is a set of policies and orders passed for the purpose of countering the effects of hundreds of years of discrimination against minorities, like African Americans, Hispanics, and Native Americans. So they instituted affirmative action, an alternative for racial quotas and preferences.
It can lower the accountability standards that are needed to push employees and students to perform better. In the same manner, schools should allocate a certain percentage of the total enrollment to minorities. There is no constitutional objection to the goal of considering race as one modest factor among many others to achieve diversity, but an educational institution must ensure, through sufficient procedures, that each applicant receives individual consideration and that race does not become a predominant factor in the admissions decision making. It is also important for the university to meet its Perez 2 desired level of diversity, thus through affirmative action this can be achieved. Proponents claim that it is necessary in order to give minorities representation in these institutions, while opponents say that it is reverse discrimination. .
Despite the gains brought about by affirmative action to the African-American, opponents still argue that affirmative action has created a big gap between the middle-class and lower class African-Americans Edwards, 2009. Is education easily obtained for the minority groups of people? Following slavery came segregation, which was enforced by law and social bias. Again, the policy makes sure this does not happen. Conclusion The government, as a whole, maintains a position somewhere in the middle with regards to issue on keeping or removing Affirmative Action. Much of affirmative action involves exterminating discrimination and including a certain amount of individuals from different ethnic groups, genders, cultures, etc. Theoretically, racial profiling will always be imperative in evaluating the capacity of each individual.
This paper will assess the rudiments of Affirmative Action as it applies to public and private sector employers. Many believe that the abolition, or at least restructure, of affirmative action in the United States will benefit the nation for many logical reasons. Bollinger that diversity was a compelling interest for colleges to use race in admissions. When implemented inside the workplace, this policy will be the most effective way to ensure the candidates from ethnic groups are provided with the chance to prove themselves as having efficient capabilities as the candidates from other races. We recognize that the arguments in support of affirmative action are complicated.
Since the minorities in that area are low-income they cannot afford to attend a private high school that can better prepare them for college. After all, who wants to argue for unequal or discriminatory treatment of college applicants? It helps disadvantaged individuals with advancing. This period included the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, defining national citizenship Issue of Affirmative Action A major controversy encompassing the country is the issue of affirmative action. Introduction: Affirmative action in higher education should be abolished. All people are equal under the laws of the United States of America and should be treated accordingly. The Pros and Cons of Affirmative Action — Essay Sample Affirmative action was originally conceived to support equality amongst different nationalities, races, sexes and other individualizing groups. Johnson issued Executive Order 11246.